Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Pym of Nantucket's avatar

Using a software system to provide analysis is fraught with issues. I assume you assume ChatGBT is what it is: a tool to gradually take control of thinking and put it in the hands of the operators of the platform. It is not a neutral source of information. I believe it is unwise to assume you are smart enough to outsmart it and use it without being manipulated.

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

I have little doubt US intends wider war, but AI has proven itself stupid yet again; yesterday's US war technology has little bearing on others' capabilities today. AI is just a computer program subject to generic program limitations. Eg, GIGO.

What defensive systems could US provide that they haven't already provided? Just yesterday, Ansar Allah's hypersonic* strike bypassed the iron dome. 20 defense missiles missed the target. One may have hit, but failed to destroy.

Ansar Allah also already chased out US Navy. So understaffed & decrepit they can no longer maintain minimal force requirements stated in their doctrine. Hmmm...maybe British navy could help! 😂 (Sometimes I crack myself up!)

* May not be true hypersonic with Russia's full, powerful maneuverability. But good enough, it seems.

No time to finish article. Insomnia is winding down. Did GPT AI consider Iran's ability to shut down Strait of Hormuz? Iran's new mutual defense agreement with Russia?

Back to bed now ...

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts